Can We Live Without Hope? Hans-Georg Gadamer on Health & Tech - Entangled Health Virtual Series
Welcome to the virtual edition
of Entangled Health.
Everyone defines health
differently.
Nothing exists in isolation and
body, mind, environment.
Everything is interconnected,
everything is entangled.
My guests at Entangled Health
come from all walks of life.
Quantum physics, AI, biotech,
healing arts, and creative
fields.
Each brings a unique perspective
where technology meets
philosophy and together we
expand our horizons.
We are launching the virtual
series and this is an experiment
and you can participate.
Usually my guests are alive when
I speak with them, but some
vital insights come from voices
that are no longer with us.
So instead of artificially
resurrecting these voices or
faking them, I choose to enter
directly into the dialogue with
their texts.
And I do this on Sub Stack.
There you can read the full
virtual conversation with my
first virtual guests on Skilled
Gardener and you find the link
in the comment.
So a podcast with a tit without
a fake voice?
That sounds tricky.
So what do we have here?
No fake voices of the virtual
guests themselves.
Instead, an AI generated podcast
featuring virtual voices about
the interview, analyzing and
contextualizing the content from
the written conversation for
you.
Let me know what you think and
let's go.
Welcome to the deep dive.
If you're here, you know the
drill.
We dive into complex sources so
you don't have to, and we pull
out the insights you can
actually use.
Today we're doing something a
little different, something that
sits right at the intersection
of, well, philosophy, health,
and some very modern technology.
We're focusing on the work of
the German philosopher Hans
Gorgatimer, a huge figure in the
20th century and.
Specifically, we're looking at
his ideas on understanding on
health and really what it means
to be human in a world that's
changing.
So so.
Fast now.
The source material for this is
what makes it so interesting.
It's not a dry academic paper.
We're working from a written
virtual interview.
Right from the Entangled Health
series.
And what the author did was
create a dialogue with
Gettemer's actual texts.
You know his major works like
Truth and Method and The Enigma
of Health.
And they were so transparent
about this process, it's really
refreshing.
It is.
They made a very deliberate
choice, a really thoughtful one,
to not use any synthetic voices
or AI to generate Getimer's
answers.
Which I just loved.
I mean, it gets right to the
heart of what we're about to
talk about, doesn't it?
Dialogue.
Honesty.
Exactly.
The source says it was to stop
the reader from being seduced
into forgetting that something
is being constructed.
It keeps the whole encounter
honest.
So our mission today is to pull
out these core ideas,
hermeneutics, dialogue, this
concept of entanglement, and see
how they apply to, well,
everything.
Modern medicine, AI, our own
search for meaning.
It's all connected and the whole
thing kicks off with this
beautiful quote about
friendship.
He calls it a mirror of self
knowledge.
But it's the last part that
really hits.
The most beautiful and consoling
part, he says, is seeing what
could still apply to oneself.
The subjunctive that potential.
It's not about who you are, but
who you could become through
that encounter with another
person.
It's a beautiful starting point.
OK, let's unpack this for anyone
listening who might not have a
philosophy degree.
Let's talk about the big one.
Hermeneutics, right?
In simple terms, hermeneutics is
the art and science of
understanding of interpretation.
And we're doing it all the time,
right?
Constantly reading an e-mail,
trying to figure out what your
boss really means, looking at a
piece of art.
That's all hermeneutics.
Gaderer just took it and applied
it to, well, all of human
experience.
And his big controversial point,
especially for us today, was
that understanding is not a
matter of method.
Yes, and that is so
counterintuitive for us.
We're all about the five step
plan, the algorithm, the
checklist.
We think if we just follow the
steps, we'll get the right
answer.
And Gaderer says no, that's not
how deep understanding works.
It's not a mechanical process.
It's an active human engagement.
But wait a minute, in medicine
method is everything.
The scientific method, clinical
trials, you can't just throw
that out, can you?
Isn't that dangerous?
That's a perfect question.
He's not saying get rid of
method altogether, he's saying
it has limits.
Method can give you data, it can
give you a diagnosis, but it
can't give you meaning.
So the lab results are the
method.
Exactly.
But true healing that requires
the doctor to understand the
patient's whole story, their
life, their context, and that
part.
That is not a method.
Which brings us to its most
famous idea, the fusion of
horizons.
Horizon Rush.
Melzong.
It sounds so grand.
It is, but the concept is
actually quite intuitive.
Your horizon is basically
everything you can see from your
vantage point, your knowledge,
your culture, your history, and
your prejudgments.
He used the word prejudice in a
neutral way, didn't he?
Completely.
For him a prejudice is just a
pre understanding.
It's the starting point you need
to even begin to understand
anything.
You can't start from zero.
So they're like the tools I
bring to the conversation.
Precisely.
And the fusion happens when your
horizon meets someone else's.
You don't just adopt their view,
and they don't adopt yours.
In that space between you,
something new emerges.
So.
I have to be willing to be
changed by the conversation.
That's the absolute key, Gatimer
said.
We must be wanting to let
something be said.
It's a radical openness and you
can see how vital that is for a
doctor listening to a patient.
That idea of being open, of
being entangled with the other
person, leads us right to the
title of the source, Entangled
health.
What did he mean by that?
For him, entangled was this
perfect word to describe how we
exist in history.
He said history does not belong
to us, but rather we to it.
Ah, so we're not outside of it
looking in, we're woven into it.
Exactly.
And health is the same.
It's not some objective thing we
can control from a distance.
It's a process, an event that we
are living inside of.
It's always dynamic.
So health isn't a thing you
possess like a car, it's more
like a state of being in balance
with the world.
A dynamic balance.
He's the Greek word metreon.
It's not a static perfect
balance.
It's more like an inner sense of
appropriate, a constant
adjustment.
Health is the ability to
maintain that inner accord.
And there's a paradox here,
isn't there?
Something about health being
hidden.
Yes, that's one of his most
profound points.
Health, he says, hides itself in
its very functioning.
Meaning when you have it, you
don't notice it.
Think about it.
When you feel great, you're not
thinking about your lungs or
your heart rate.
You're just living, absorbed in
what you're doing.
You only become aware of your
health when it's gone.
It's a state of integration.
Perfect word, a state of
integration into life.
Let's pull on that thread of
entanglement.
In physics, you have quantum
entanglement, 2 particles linked
no matter the distance.
Can we apply that
metaphorically?
Does that kind of deep human
recognition create a sort of
psychosocial entanglement that
can actually affect healing?
The source argues very strongly.
Yes, Gatimir himself would be
cautious with the physics term,
but the principle is the same.
The act of truly seeing, of
recognizing another person,
that's a transformative act.
It changes reality.
So it's not a one way St. when a
doctor really listens, they're
not just gathering data, they're
Co creating a space where
healing can happen.
That's the mechanism.
The quality of the attention
itself becomes a therapeutic
agent, and modern science is
catching up to this.
You mean like neuroscience or
psycho neuroimmunology?
Exactly the study of how your
mind and your relationships
affect your immune system.
There's growing evidence that
deep mutual engagement can
literally modulate physiological
processes in the body.
So the take away for you
listening is you don't heal
alone.
Never, the source says.
This is why a good word, a deep
listening, or a look of trust
can sometimes shift the course
of an illness.
It awakens something latent in
the person.
OK, but if healing is so
dependent on this deep human
presence, where does that leave
all our technology, our
algorithms, our.
AI Gatimer was already grappling
with this.
He was deeply skeptical of any
promise of absolute certainty.
Since understanding isn't a
method, he knew that AI could be
a powerful calculator.
It can spot patterns.
We can for sure.
But it lacks the bodily
historical lived experience
required for genuine
understanding.
Which is the critical
distinction now with large
language models with LLMS?
The source asks that question
directly.
Can LLM ever achieve real
Gadamarian understanding?
And based on his work, the
answer has to be no.
They're amazing, don't get me
wrong, but they are statistical
echoes.
They rearrange human language
based on probability.
They mimic, meaning they don't
create it.
And the distinction lies in
risk, doesn't it?
And LLM can write a beautiful
paragraph about courage, but it
risks nothing by writing it.
That is the entire point.
It's detached from lived
experience.
It's never felt pain or fear or
hope.
It doesn't bear what he called
existential risk.
When a machine tells you
something, it's indifferent.
When a human tells you
something, they are implicated.
They have skin in the game.
So if we just chase efficiency
and data, we risk losing that
essential humanity.
So how do we innovate without,
well, without losing our souls?
Gatimir actually gives us a
really hopeful path, he says.
Tradition is not a burden but a
resource.
So don't throw everything out.
No.
You enter into a dialogue with
it.
You test your own assumptions,
your own prejudices.
The real danger is what he
called the tyranny of hidden
prejudices, where we become so
focused on what's measurable
that we forget to ask if it's
meaningful.
Let's bring this back to health.
We're all tracking our steps,
our sleep, quantifying
everything.
What did Gadimir see as the
biggest mistake we make in
thinking about health?
It's that very idea.
Treating health is simply the
absence of illness.
It's the clinical view.
The check boxes are all clear,
so you must be healthy.
But that's not the whole story.
Not even close.
For him, health is integration
into life, a state of an active
and rewarding participation in
everyday duties.
It's about functioning well in
your world.
It's that unspectacular miracle
again, being so absorbed in
living that you don't even think
about it.
Absolutely.
The disease is what we can
measure and pinpoint true
health.
This deep sense of inner accord,
it sort of defies objective
scientific methods of
measurement.
It's just living.
And yet, even with all this
uncertainty and mystery, he was
a huge advocate for hope.
He insisted on it.
He said people cannot live
without hope.
The goal isn't perfect
certainty.
The goal is to keep the dialogue
going.
I have to say I loved the little
personal story from the
interview.
It really brings all this high
level philosophy right down to
earth.
Comfort food question.
What's your go to comfort food
after a long day of quantum
thinking?
And his answer was perfect.
Very strong coffee.
But not just as fuel.
No, that's the key.
He described it as a ritual
pause, a moment to anchor his
abstract thoughts back into his
living, breathing body.
A reminder that thinking doesn't
happen in a vacuum.
It happens in a body, in a
place, in a time.
That's a beautiful thought.
And Speaking of questions, he
actually offered one back to the
project for us.
He did, and it feels like he
wrote it this morning.
He asked, in a world
increasingly shaped by rapid
technological change and
constant demands for certainty,
how can we cultivate the art of
genuinely living with
uncertainty, ambiguity and not
knowing?
That is the challenge, isn't it?
For all of.
Us it is.
And his answer is his whole
philosophy in a nutshell.
It's an act of courage.
It's sustaining that tension
between what you know and what
you don't.
It's being open to being changed
by the world.
It is the highest form of
responsiveness.
He had a final message in the
source, a kind of closing
statement.
He did, he said.
The real value of everything,
Health, Science, technology at
all, lies an encounter, and that
what is said in language
constitutes the common world in
which we live.
That's where it all happens, in
that shared world we build with
words.
So what does this all mean for
you?
Listening.
Navigating your life?
Your work.
I think it means we have to
consciously practice embracing,
not knowing, to see that
understanding isn't a final
destination, it's a process, and
that health isn't a possession
to be guarded, but a dynamic
accord we have to constantly
cultivate.
And you can apply this
everywhere.
That difficult conversation at
work?
That's an opportunity for a
fusion of horizons.
That new AI tool?
It's an invitation to a new kind
of dialogue, not a replacement
for your own messy human
understanding.
Exactly.
So we'll leave you with this
last thought from Gatimer.
He suggested that in healing,
the structure of play absorbs
the player into itself and thus
frees him from the burden of
taking the initiative.
So if that's true, what parts of
your own life, your health, your
work, your relationships are you
trying so hard to control that
you might benefit from simply
letting play?
People cannot live without hope.
And that was Entangled Health,
the virtual series.
Thank you very much for
listening to this experiment and
see you next time.
You can find the link to the
full article in the comments and
feel free to share your thoughts
there if you enjoyed it.
Don't forget to subscribe to the
channel so you don't miss a
thing.
Stay kind, stay curious, and
keep exploring with Entangled
Health.
Creators and Guests
